Senia Soto

Please read! I had consulted her inregaurds to a child custody matter and I had already done all my paperwork and had reports proving my ex husband lied and falsely fabricated allegations and forced my children to lie including my ex husband's wife took part in it as well. I was seeking her service, before my ex husband and his wife retained her. Before I move forward All of this happened to me because my ex husband new wife did not want him to pay me child support............ allegations after allegations it was hell with that lady....... but here's my share of experience with Sheri's Office . Moving forward I received a letter notifying me of representation of Sheri Perlmans office . Indicating she was representing my ex husband's wife in the adoption process. Which included Sandra as well who was helping in the case...... I had previously mentioned to her ( Sheri ) my custody situation and she was willing to take my case. ( previously) before my ex husband and his wife retained her. Moving forward...... I received a 17 page child adoption report from the child adoption investigator 1 year later from Family Court Services. The report itself indicated it was denied to my ex husband's wife based on false allegations and based on the history dynamics of my case. It essentially was a high conflict case. Very disturbing facts and evidence in the report that I received from the child adoption investigator. Sheri's office never reached out or sent me a copy of the report. It was amusing to me that they requested my signatures for the adoption, when my ex husband's wife consulted with them and hire them. However Sheri's office failed to send me a copy of the denied adoption notice regarding the denial. As I stated my ex husband and his wife hired her to represent them for the adoption. ( the irony of it all ) If Sheri had done her homework correctly and listened to what I had told her and read through the copies of every document I provided to her this report would have never landed in my possession. ( If she was smart enough ) she would have rejected to take my ex husband's case and not represent them for the adoption, she would of known it would be denied immediately based on the evidence I provided to her office. But she didn't do her Job correctly which is her problem and not mine :) However I am thankful that it was done because I am now in the process of bringing my daughter's home and even if it is a lengthy process. I AM NOT GIVING UP. The denial adoption report would have never happened if my ex husband's wife would have NOT applied for an adoption and if Sheri didn't represented her . I have to ADMIT it turned out to work in my favor and a huge slap in all their faces.👏👏👏👏👏👏🙌 I had definitely mentioned more than several times and nobody listened to me until finally now an investigation took place and thank God it happened because everything ( I mean everything was brought to light in that report ) There is no denying the facts and evidence found as to why the adoption is denied to my ex husband new wife custody over my two minor children. As much as I was upset that Sheri picked up the case, it actually worked out in my favor and not theirs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I won this one ( again ) #trustingtheprocess #BetterDaysAhead #trustingod

Karina Pompa

My experience with this firm was great! I was represented by attorney Sandra Lopez. Sandra was professional from beginning to end. She worked on my child custody case from 2018-2023 and her goal was my daughter’s best interest throughout those years. Along with Sandra’s expertise and professionalism, I was able to feel confident and comfortable during the whole process.

Cyp

I was represented by Sandra Lopez. Her length of expertise was useful, and her transparency was a plus. She was an amazing advocate throughout my child support/custody case. Would recommend her.

Samuel F. Reyes

But attitude. If you're a man looking for a law attorney I don't recommend Sandra's office. She was judgemental, but attitude. Doesn't let you explain or talk and comes out with her own conclusions before seeing the whole case in front of her. Very unprofessional.

Beaty Mode

Unprofessional. Specially Sandra López, she doesn't care about reunification of the family AND THE KIDS Reunite with the PARENT. She only cares about what is going to retain her FOR THE MONEY. If its giving her MONEY Sandra will definitely WILL NOT MAKE THE EFFORT to reunite them. The judge can say is up to you SANDRA TO CONNECT THE PARENT WITH THE CHILDREN, BUT SHE WILL CHOOSE what makes not the best of interest of the CHILDREN but HER BEST INTEREST, THE MONEY. Sadly but TRUE.