Attorney at Law

What is Patent False Marking?

According to United States federal law, a private individual, on behalf of the government, may bring a Patent False Marking suit against any party that marks an unpatented article with the bad-faith intent of deceiving the public. In these cases, the court may award damages of “not more than $500 for every such offense.” The damages are to be split between the US government and the private individual that brought the patent false marking case forward.

The use of an expired patent may be considered patent false marking, so it is important to pay close attention to your actual filing date.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent false marking occurs when a party marks an unpatented article with the intent of deceiving the public.
  • The US government awards up to $500 per falsely marked article. The damages are distributed evenly between the government and the party that brought the patent false marking case forward.
  • The America Invents Act (AIA) changed several important requirements regarding patent false marking.

Elements of Patent False Marking

There are three conditions that must be met for a situation to qualify as patent false marking.

  • Marking or advertising any unpatented article without the consent of the patent owner.
  • The word “patent” is used or any word or number implying that the article is patented, or the word “patent pending” is used when there is no such patent pending.
  • It was done with the purpose of deceiving the public.

Patent False Marking After the America Invents Act (AIA)

On September 15, 2011, the America Invents Act (AIA) came into effect in the United States. The federal statute, which was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama, made several significant changes to the US patent system. These modifications included strict limitations on patent false marking lawsuits.

Before the AIA was enacted “any person” was legally allowed to sue a company for patent false marking and receive damages. As a result, many began scouring the market, looking for patent false markings in order to claim a big payout. However, the AIA limited who can collect damages by stating that only people “who have suffered a competitive injury as a result of” may receive damages for patent false marking. If the false marking prevented a party from entering the market, he or she may also be able to prove competitive injury according to the recent case following the enactment of the AIA.

Bottom Line

Patent false marking is a complicated element of intellectual property law in the United States. There have been several recent changes to these laws, and damages for these matters are often determined on a case-by-case basis, so navigating patent false marking can be difficult. If you have been faced with a patent false marking suit, or if you are interested in learning if you are eligible to file a suit against another party, reach out to a professional IP lawyer as soon as possible. You will be able to count on him or her for all of your IP-related needs.

Ask a Lawyer

Ask your own question and get advice from expert attorneys
Ask Question

Featured Intellectual Property Lawyers

Law Office of Edwin Burnett

36 years in practice
Copyright, Intellectual Property
View Profile

Weaver Robinson Law Firm, PLLC

40 years in practice
Bankruptcy, Intellectual Property
View Profile

The Law Offices of Scott E. Schutzman

29 years in practice
Employment Law, Intellectual Property, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury
View Profile


1 years in practice
Insurance Law, Personal Injury
View Profile

Issa Law, LLC

13 years in practice
Auto Accidents, Bicycle Accidents, Criminal Defense, DUI Law, Motorcycle Accidents
View Profile

Law Office of Tal Rubin, PC

22 years in practice
Auto Accidents, Personal Injury
View Profile


Are you looking for an attorney? Do you have questions about a legal case you are facing? Contact us now and we will put you in touch with a lawyer for free.

Related Posts

Senior User
Lia Kopin-GreenOctober 25, 2022
Patent Troll
Lia Kopin-GreenOctober 23, 2022
Patent Application
Lia Kopin-GreenSeptember 22, 2022
Fanciful Trademark
Lia Kopin-GreenSeptember 1, 2022
Attorney At Law is changing how clients connect with lawyers. By providing an innovative platform to lawyers who want to expand their practice’s reach, AAL is bringing law practices into the future.
6142 Innovation Way
Carlsbad, California 92009
Some of the content of this website may be considered attorney advertising under the rules of certain jurisdictions. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute an attorney-client relationship.
crossmenuchevron-upchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram