The term “liquidated damages” refers to a predetermined, fixed sum agreed upon in a contract to compensate the non-breaching party for the anticipated loss resulting from a breach, regardless of the actual damages incurred.
As a general matter, contract remedies are not meant to be punitive (that is, punish the breaching party). Instead, they are designed to 'make whole' the party affected by a breach, restoring them to the position they would have been in if the contract was fully performed. The ability to effectively achieve this hinges on the ability to accurately quantify the actual harm suffered by the non-breaching party due to the breach.
This can be problematic in cases where there is no historical financial data to gauge expectation damages, as is often the case with new business ventures, or consequential damages are difficult to ascertain at the contract's outset, such as with contracts involving complex projects where delays can have cascading effects but the exact extent of harm is uncertain. In these situations, liquidated damages can be essential to provide a clear, agreed-upon framework for compensation, thereby reducing the need for costly and time-consuming litigation to prove actual damages.
While liquidated damages can offer significant benefits, they also have the potential for misuse, particularly in situations with unequal bargaining power. For instance, consider a large hotel chain and a local contractor engaged in a $100,000 hotel construction project. An unfairly imposed clause stating that if the project isn't completed within six months, the contractor will receive no payment and owe the hotel chain $30,000 for lost revenue exemplifies such abuse.
For the reasons discussed above, courts will often scrutinize liquidated damages clauses closely and invalidate them when they deem a clause to be punitive, rather than a reasonable forecast of the damages anticipated due to the breach. For these purposes, courts will examine the following factors:
To ensure that liquidated damages are considered fair and reasonable, (and therefore legally binding), it is advisable to:
By following these practices, parties can create liquidated damages clauses that provide certainty and clarity in the event of a breach and are more likely to be held enforceable by the courts.
Example: BuildRight Construction signs a contract to complete a new luxury hotel for PrestigeSuites Hotels within 18 months. The timely opening of the hotel is critical for PrestigeSuites to capitalize on the upcoming tourist season. The contract states that for every day past the deadline that the hotel is not ready for opening, BuildRight Construction will pay PrestigeSuites a predetermined sum. This amount is based on PrestigeSuites's projected daily revenue from the hotel operations, factoring in the high tourist season rates. Because it contained a fair and reasonable estimate of lost profits, the court will likely uphold the clause.