Front Pay

By James Parker
/
June 1, 2022

What Is Front Pay?

Front pay is a term that refers to some earnings or benefits that have been lost as the result of discriminatory action. Front pay is one of the types of damages that can be awarded to a victim of employment discrimination.

Front pay is calculated by determining what wages, benefits, or opportunities were denied to the victim of discrimination because of the employer’s discriminatory behavior. This can include pay and benefits lost from denied wages, promotions or enrollment for benefits packages due to discriminatory behavior. 

If front pay is awarded to the employee, the length of the front pay calculation will depend on how long the employee will continue to lose pay. This can include more nebulous calculations, such as how long an employee takes to acquire a new job after losing their current job because of discrimination. The exact length of time that will be paid out can be determined either through demonstrating unsuccessful attempts to find work or having an economist or other qualified expert testify as to the amount of front pay owed to the employee during the discrimination trial.

Key Takeaways

  • Front pay is a method of awarding damages to employees who are found to have been victims of discriminatory behavior.
  • Unlike other forms of restitution, front pay awards all future losses that have occurred as a result of the discriminatory behavior, such as paying the employee all the wages they would have received had they remained in their old position while they sought out a new job.
  • While front pay is a remedy that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission can order, it is not usually the preferred remedy unless certain circumstances are met.
  • If you have experienced employment discrimination and want to seek front pay, back pay, or other compensatory damages, an experienced Employment Law attorney may be able to improve the outcome of your case by utilizing experience and expert knowledge.

Front Pay and Employment Law

Front pay is one of the many remedies that may be ordered by the courts or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The philosophy of front pay and other forms of compensation for employment discrimination is that these awards are intended to “make whole” the victim. By using these awards to make the victim whole again, the EEOC and courts hope to return the victim of discrimination to as near as possible to the position that they would hold if they had not been the victim of discrimination. This can mean attempting to restore their position financially, professionally, or mentally depending on the wrong done and the severity of the discrimination.

Front pay makes the employee whole by compensating them until they can find new, nondiscriminatory work. In general, front pay is not used as a remedy. According to the EEOC, “The remedy of front pay compensates a victim in situations where reinstatement or nondiscriminatory placement would be an available remedy, but is denied for reasons peculiar to the individual claim.” This means that unless certain circumstances prevent alternatives, front pay is not usually on the table. 

The EEOC does have three major exceptions to this general principle which they have explained in detail. Front pay may be determined to be the most appropriate solution if:

  1. There is no position available to reinstate the wronged employee.
  2. The employee's reinstatement would result in an antagonistic relationship where “a productive and amicable working relationship would be impossible.”
  3. The employer who is engaging in discriminatory behavior has a record of “long-term resistance” to efforts to curb discriminatory behavior.

In these specific circumstances, the EEOC may opt to move directly for awarding the wronged employee front pay rather than the generally preferred remedy of reinstatement or nondiscriminatory placement.

Bottom Line

Suppose you have experienced discriminatory behavior from an employer where reinstatement of your employment would only result in a hostile and unproductive work environment. In that case, you may benefit from pursuing front pay as an alternative solution. To pursue this solution, you will need the help of an Employment Law attorney.

An experienced Employment Law attorney can not only demonstrate the discriminatory behavior that you have been subjected to, but they can also advocate for you. This advocacy can include explaining why standard remedies such as reinstatement would not be in your best interest and instead of pushing for alternative methods of compensation such as front pay.

Featured Employment Law Lawyers

Ray Rojas Law L.L.C.

Google rating
4.8
12 years in practice
Criminal Defense, DUI Law, Employment Law, Immigration Law
View Profile

Pascoe Law Offices

Google rating
5
34 years in practice
Criminal Defense, DUI Law, Employment Law
View Profile

Bratton & Springer, LLP

Google rating
4.8
34 years in practice
Auto Accidents, DUI Law, Employment Law, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury
View Profile

Law Office of Maria Hajar

Google rating
5
6 years in practice
Business Law, Immigration Law
View Profile

Cornerstone Law Group

Google rating
4
12 years in practice
Business Law, Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law, DUI Law, Sexual Assault
View Profile

Related Posts

Title VII
James ParkerJune 28, 2022
Accident
Daisy RogozinskyApril 20, 2022
Temporary Partial Disability (TPD)
Daisy RogozinskyMay 16, 2022
Attorney At Law is changing how clients connect with lawyers. By providing an innovative platform to lawyers who want to expand their practice’s reach, AAL is bringing law practices into the future.
6142 Innovation Way
Carlsbad, California 92009
© 2022 Attorney at Law | All rights reserved
Some of the content of this website may be considered attorney advertising under the rules of certain jurisdictions. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute an attorney-client relationship.
crossmenuchevron-upchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram