
The due process clause is an important element of the United States Constitution with implications for the execution of both civil and criminal law. In this article, we’ll define the term “due process clause” and its two types.
The due process clause is the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868, which says that there is a legal obligation of all states that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The same thing is written relevant to the federal government in the Fifth Amendment. The due process clause ensures that all levels of the American government must operate within the law and provide fair procedures. It applies to both civil and criminal law.
There are two categories of due process: procedural due process and substantive due process. In short, procedural due process is how the law is carried out and substantive due process determines whether a law violates constitutional protections or not.
Procedural due process is based on the principles of “fundamental fairness,” addressing which legal procedures are required to be followed in state proceedings. This relates to issues such as:
According to procedural due process, if the federal government acts in a way that denies a citizen a life, liberty, or property interest, the citizen must be given notice, the chance to be heard, and a decision by a neutral third party (judge or jury).
There is no definitive list of processes required for due process. However, there is a list written by Judge Henry Friendly of procedures that might be claimed in a due process argument. In order of perceived importance, these include:
Substantive due process is a principle that allows courts to protect fundamental rights from governmental interference. It is used to evaluate whether a law can be applied by states at all, regardless of the procedure followed. It usually deals with areas such as liberty of contract or privacy.
In practice, substantive due process has had greater political weight than procedural due process because large portions of a state legislature’s substantive jurisdiction can be restricted by it. Courts have taken an assertive approach to upholding due process, resulting in the executive and legislative branches of the government repeatedly adjusting laws and statutes.


