<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Attorney At Law &#187; defibrillator leads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.attorneyatlaw.com/tag/defibrillator-leads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.attorneyatlaw.com</link>
	<description>Your source for legal news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:42:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dismissal of Medtronic Injury Lawsuits Sends Wrong Message to Injured Patients</title>
		<link>http://www.attorneyatlaw.com/2009/01/dismissal-of-medtronic-injury-lawsuits-sends-wrong-message-to-injured-patients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.attorneyatlaw.com/2009/01/dismissal-of-medtronic-injury-lawsuits-sends-wrong-message-to-injured-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medtronic Sprint Fidelis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defibrillator leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medtronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Fidelis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attorneyatlaw.com/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge in Minneapolis has dealt a major blow to the rights of thousands of people across the United States who are killed or injured by defective medical devices. Citing a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, the judge dismissed more than two dozen personal injury lawsuits which had been filed seeking damages caused by a faulty heart device. The ruling comes on the heels of the controversial February 2008 decision by the Supreme Court, which said victims of defective &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.attorneyatlaw.com/2009/01/dismissal-of-medtronic-injury-lawsuits-sends-wrong-message-to-injured-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

